▶ Your Answer :
While it will be true that the number of
visitors in Stanly Park is decreasing, and setting more benches will be helpful
for maintain the visitors, it seems not plausible in that there is too many
assumptions and lacking of information, so I cannot accept the statement’s
argument.
First, although the park is not crowded by
visitors, still a lot of people will use this parks and it will be a suitable
level since the park is very large. Also video camera installed just on month
ago and in the parking area, it cannot provide sufficient evidence of
diminished visitors. For example, harsh whether condition in this month make
people stay in their home, so it might be a reason of the dropped number of
people who visited the park. Thus, deceased number of people in this month
might be a transitory condition and a lot of people will visit this park,
though the part is not crowded.
The author should provide more cogent
evidence in order to show the number of people using this park both contemporary
and past.
Second, the statement provide the example
of Carlton Park in order to authenticate the problem of Stanly Park, it seems
not cogent in that they have different conditions and it will not be suitable
to compare to the number of people and number of cars. For example, the
visitors of Carlton Park might not use the car to visit the park since it is
located nearby the resident areas. Also, the unit of family will be more then
4, so total number of people using the car in the Carlton Park will be more
than 200 people which is greater than the number of people who visited the
Carlton Park. In addition, two parks will have different conditions and
purpose, so it is not unlikely that comparing two parks is absurd.
Therefore, the author should provide more
information for comparing two parks.
Finally, even if all of arguments made by
author is true, it is unlikely that the bench is a good solution. This is
because it will be possible that people visit the park for leisure activities. Well
organized facilities in the park might be famous for visitors, so increasing
the bench will not attract people. Also, it will has a spacious lawn, so people
will use this area to take a rest instead bench.
So, without more information about using
the park, people cannot accept this argument.
Consequently, while the statement’s
suggestion can operate well, it also possible not to reach their goal. we
cannot make a decision using only this statement, so the author should provide
more plausible information about this park.
|