▶ Your Answer :
Citing
several information about Balmer Island’s accident between mopeds and pedestrians
in the summer time, the argument here concluded that the government must
enforce lowering down moped rental numbers up to 50 percent. However, this
argument relies on unproven assumptions, which attributed its illogicality,
thus more questions related to diverse factors should be answered.
To begin
with, the writer claimed that lowering the number of rental moped can help
reduce the number of accidents, however, the correlation between the two values
is not effectively made. The fact of increased accident may merely due to
improper driving style or pedestrians’ unsafe deeds. Or perhaps there would be
a rainy season in the summer that can cause more incidents. Thus, the following
question must be answered: Based on what information or data, does the author
argue the correlation?
In addition
to the question about correlation between rented moped numbers and accidents, the
reason for “50 percent reduction” should be scrutinized. The author assumes
that the half point lowering would work by citing Seaville’s example, this would
not be the case for Balmer. Since different cities have different aspects and
unique situations, why the 50 percent was suggested must be reconsidered.
Therefore, more detailed and diverse-perspective based evidence are necessary
to suffice here.
Also, the
author only focused on “rental mopeds,” which is somewhat biased viewpoint because
there should be owned moped drives in Balmer. Given this thought, even though
the government enforced to lower the rental modped numbers, the decision will
not likely result in decreased number of accidents. This is because that the correlation
between owned mopeds and accident might be stronger than the rentals and
accidents. What is the proportion of mopeds ownership in Balmer? This question must
be examined with this reason.
Finally, it
sounds persuasive to bring up the figure of 50 percent according to Seaville’s
previous case, nonetheless, more in-depth investigation between the two area
should be provided. If all related data indicated that lowering mopeds is the
answer, but the 50 would not be the accurate figure because the two areas’ environment
would be different. For example, Seaville can be locageed at mountainous areas
and Balmer can be flat. This type of factor may influence how many percent
should be reduced.
In sum, even
though it seems that the author cites various data and statistics, the argument
need to answer more questions to cogently support its claims. The questions
should answer what the clear correlation between mopeds and accidents is,
whether the 50 percent is appropriate figure for Balmer, what the Balmer’s
moped ownership styles are, and what the similarities and differences between
the two cities are. |