Your Answer ▼ It is a common belief that police officers have to use more powerful weapons because crimes occurred in these days are much cruel than ever before. However, there is a more persuasive argument that these weapons should be controlled due to a possible threat to the public.
On the one hand, some people contend that it is better for making people's safer lives by for police to use using powerful weapons by police. Many experts also claim that better weapons may decrease a the number of crimes significantly. They even say that weapons are likely to be more powerful than rigid laws. Police should be able to safeguard people. This is the reason why police officers are always nearby. 더 강력한 무기를 가져야 하는 것과 관련없는 설명입니다. For instance, if there were situations like terrorism, police with strong weapons would are be absolutely effective for preventing to prevent them. Criminals possibly look down police without strong weapons, and this may lead to catastrophic crimes as well.
Nevertheless, stronger weapons also have a possibility of to a threat to the public, because there is always a chance to harm people excessively. It cannot be assured that the weapons are always used for a good reason. 다른 사람을 다치게 할 우려가 있다는 점과 늘 좋은 의도로 사용되는 것은 아니라는 점은 전혀 다른 내용입니다. 문단의 일관성이 유지되도록 흐름을 다듬어주세요. For example, in Korea, at the end of the last year, there was a case when an innocent man was shot by a Taser gun. This man was actually pursuing a real criminal who stole a woman's wallet at that time. However, a police officer failed to determine which man was is a the criminal, so the man could not help but being was shot. Then he went to the a hospital for some days recovering his condition. In this case, we are able to recognize strong weapons can be a double-edged sword from time to time.
To sum up, while it is apparent that police with powerful weapons have its own advantages on the public safety, it is undeniable that police with blind right on using weapons can damage people's safety conversely. |