wild animals do not have enough space.some people think that protection of wild animals from extiction is a waste of money because it is natural. To what extent do you agree or disagree? |
Since the boom of the industrization has been occured,many species has been vanished dramatically or almost colse to extinct. However in nowdays. alot of countries are trying to concentrate on protecting the animals gradually to prohibit the extermination. In contrast to this trend,some people argue that spending the money to preserve the wild animals are definitely inefficinet.Opposed to their opinion I completly disagree with the statement for the following reasons. First of all,In the long run this money will worth the future plan. In the short run, it seems to be not workable like studying English. At the first time when the people have studied just a day or a week, they can likely feel that whether it is properly make it or not and may feel depressed,but as the time goes by they will probably feel positive with their English study. Likewise this example, this plan is going to effect on not near future ,but far future. Another reason why I support my opinion is if this fund stop or pretty reduced at some time then it will become serious extermination of the wild animals.The money initially tried to use for the preserving them will be going to use for more developing the industries which will lead to serious pollution and in addtion to this, animal hunters are much more relaxably able to catch the wild animals due to fairly decline the number of the anti hunters.These situations are going to destoy the whole envionment step by step. In conclusion probably comsuming money to shelter the wild animals looks rather useless and maybe this monetary might be use for other beneficail purposes like supporting the poor or the elders.However we cannot live without the nature and as i commented above the reasons I storngly suggest that our world have to fairly focus on the funding for the wild animals to preserve them. |