▶ Your Answer :
Nowadays, we can easily know what is going on at the oposite side of our city thanks to high-develpoed technology. Furthermore, even we are diagnosed by having cancer, we can survive in the results of new remedies and sophisticated operation. However majority people seemed like overlook the situation in developing countries such as Africa where famine and deseases are prevailed. For those nations assisatance from developed countries is indespensable.
It is believed that financial aid is the most important for poor nations. Advocaters state that money can solve any problems spreaded in poor nations. They can buy medicines for desases as well as prevent contagious ailments by injecting in advance. In addition famine which has been killing so many children might be solved if children are given money to buy something to eat. Due to the thought that money can solve everything, financial advocater approve their method strongly.
On the other hand, vast majority people argue that developed nations should help developing countries by more practical and educational aids instead of just giving money. They have speculated that poor nations have corrupted governments which spend tax and public money on only for their happines. That makes vicious cycle which make the poor to poor and the rich to rich.
They state practical aid such as the education to teach how to manage their tax and assistance from other nations is more significant than just throw money in rotten governments.
I strongly agree with second method. The remark ‘money can slove every problem’ is based on totally exaggerated assumption. Even in lion’s society, mothers never catch preys for their babies; they teach and encourage how to survive in nature. As human-being, people in poor countries have same rights to live like people in developed countries. For stopping vicious cycle in poor nations, conference or international organisations by rich countries such as G8 or G20 should help by more pragmatic ways.
|