Your Answer ▼ It seems that there are different perspectives on when children should start to receive an education. While some argue that it is better for children to be involved in school from age of four, others recommend them to begin around seven. This essay will explore both views with my thoughts.
On the one hand, there are some people saying an early education exerts positive effects on not only educational improvements but also personal development. According to them, it would make it easy for youngsters to learn how to socialize and communicate with others, obtaining vital social skills and getting along with others. Further, as their personalities and personal developments are not set up, being exposed to in school circumstances where trained teachers and guaranteed learning environment are provided is the best option for youngsters. Additionally, with the growing number of double-income families, numerous children are being isolated from their parents and friends, staying at home. 많은 아이들이 집에 있어야 한다는 설명이 일찍 교육하는 것과 무슨 관련이 있는지 더 설명해주세요.
On the other hand, other people claim that students should be mature enough to get an education. Being taught without understanding of education and desires to learn, the immature pupils would be put under much stress, being sick of learning. From my own experience, I have lost my interests in field of art since I had was involved in art competition when I was only 6, which made me never try tried any kind of art again. Hence, I agree with this view, thinking forcing young generations to participate in school from early stages could generate negative side effects. 나의 입장을 뒷받침하는 주장이 반대입장을 설명하는 본론1에 비해 너무 빈약합니다. 내용을 더 보완해서 설득력을 높여주세요. In conclusion, it seems both reasonable perspectives on this issue are reasonable. given. However, the latter view is more convincing to me: as immatureness could cause problems in early education, children should be mature enough to start get disciplines. |