Your Answer ▼ It is a common belief that police officers have to use more powerful weapons because crimes occurred in these days are much cruel than ever before. However, there is a more persuasive argument that these weapons should be controlled due to a possible threat to the public.
On the one hand, some people contend that it is better for making people's safer lives by using powerful weapons by police. Many experts also claim that better weapons may decrease a number of crimes significantly. They even say that weapons are likely to be more powerful than rigid laws. Police should be able to safeguard people. This is the reason why police officers are always nearby. For instance, if there were situations like terrorism, police with strong weapons are absolutely effective to prevent them. Criminals possibly look down police without strong weapons, and this may lead to catastrophic crimes as well.
Nevertheless, stronger weapons also have a possibility to threat to the public, because there is always a chance to harm people excessively. It cannot be assured that the weapons are always used for a good reason. For example, in Korea at the end of the last year, there was a case when an innocent man was shot by a Taser gun. This man was actually pursuing a real criminal who stole a woman's wallet at that time. However, a police officer failed to determine which man is a criminal, so the man could not help but was shot. Then he went to a hospital for some days recovering his condition. In this case, we are able to recognize strong weapons can be a double-edged sword from time to time.
To sum up, while it is apparent that police with powerful weapons have its own advantages on public safety, it is undeniable that police with blind right on using weapons can damage people's safety conversely. |